Elaine Fortin writes in her paper, “Early Nineteenth Century Attitudes Toward Women and Their Roles,” that women should be given some kind of education, but not academic subject. Women should be going to school to learn how to manage a house and be able to find a husband to take care of. This relates to the argument Margaret Fuller made in her book, Woman in the Nineteenth Century that, “So much is said of women being better educated, that they may become better companions and mothers to men” (50-51). Fortin continues on that men did not want woman to be educated in academic studies because that will keep them away from the house and “home life would suffer.” If a woman was academically trained, they will not keep up and manage the house and marriages will be in trouble. With this notion, we are given the stereotype of the stay-at-home wife and mother who very well knows home economics, but not much academics in the late 19th Century to the mid 20th Century.
http://www.biography.com/articles/Margaret-Fuller-9303889#
Fortin, Elaine. "Early Nineteenth Century Attitudes Toward Women and Their Roles." Teach US History. Old Sturbridge Inc. , Web. 21 Oct 2009.
Fuller, Margaret. Woman in the Nineteenth Century. Mineola, NY: Dover Pulbications, INC., 1999. Print.
It is true that if a woman is being educated she will not be at home to do household chores. However, what harm does it do to have an educated woman doing household chores!? I believe that when she returns she will accomplish her duties more efficiently thus benefiting both the woman and the man.
ReplyDeleteWoman were not educated, and I completely agree with FireWater when he says that an education will benefit a woman. I have never heard of an instance where an education had negative side effects. In addition, an educated woman can definitely provide positive insight for her entire family.
ReplyDelete